The sentence should read: "To his horror, he found that he had slept for nearly 24 hours."
The use of the past perfect tense (had slept) indicates that the action of sleeping started in the past and continued up to the point in the past when he found out how long he had been asleep.
The correct sentence would be: "What did you do last week?"
This is a question in the past tense, asking about an action that was completed in the past (last week). The verb "did" is the correct form of the verb "do" in the past tense, and it is followed by the base form of the verb "do" (which becomes "do" instead of "does" because it's a question).
"لہذا آزادی اس وقت تک حقیقی نہیں ہوتی جب تک کہ جب حکومت حقوق پر حملہ کرتی ہے تو اس کا محاسبہ نہ کیا جائے۔" (لاسکی) مندرجہ بالا بیان میں سے کون سا جواز ہے؟
It the realization of that the Government can be brought to book in a court of law
In identifying a man as a political unit in a way which distinguishes him from other citizens
In a decentralized society wherein the basic needs of men can find satisfaction
In the understanding that liberty and restraints are complementary
The correct justification for the statement is: "It is the realization that the Government can be brought to book in a court of law."
Harold Laski's statement emphasizes the importance of holding the government accountable for any violations of individual rights and liberties.
This can only be achieved through a system of checks and balances, such as an independent judiciary, that allows citizens to seek legal recourse when their rights are infringed upon.
The legal theory of rights is limited to legal rights, which are rights recognized and protected by the law.
There are other types of rights, such as moral rights, social rights, and political rights, that are not necessarily recognized or protected by law.
This means that the legal theory of rights does not cover the whole field of rights, as it only focuses on legal rights and neglects other important aspects of rights.
